April 1st is the day upon which we are reminded of what we are on the other three hundred and sixty-four. (Mark Twain, Pudd’nhead Wilson, 1894)
Todays I don’t envie all the reporters out there. It’s is April Fool’s Day, and one needs to be on the lookout for what is real news and what is fake news. Here are my 5 favorite April Fools hoaxes from the search industry, starting with Google.
Google Mobile launched Brain Search, which uses their hoax technology CADIE (Cognitive Autoheuristic Distributed-Intelligence Entity) to “index your brain to make your thoughts and memories searchable”. The Big G also mentions some use cases for the new application: you can recall “the name of that guy across the room, where you put your car keys, why you started dating this woman in the first place”. Hehe, hillarious.
Yahoo launched a new search service called Ideological Search. The service allows searchers to “control the ideology of their search results for the first time in search technology history”.

MSN’s Live Search simply redid their homepage. Not a big effort, but still funny.

YouTube turns its videos upside down (add “&flip=1″ to URL to activate.

Reddit looks like Digg for a day.

Bonus (not search, but media related): the British newspaper Guardian announced that it will discontinue its publication after 188 years and publish its news via Twitter. Considering the state of the print media, not such a bad idea, isn’t it?
What were your favorite April Fools hoaxes on the web this year? Let me know in the comments!
Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
Posted by (0) Comment
Posted by (0) Comment
Posted by (0) Comment
The advance of technology is based on making it fit in so that you don’t really even notice it, so it’s part of everyday life. (Bill Gates)
Although the cofounder of Microsoft referred to computer technology in this quote, I’m sure it can be applied to search engine optimization as well. SEO has become part of our everyday life. The (non SEO savvy) internet user might not notice it – but the SEO pros do everything to “make it fit” for their clients. Too much of a stretch? (Feel free to disagree with me by posting a comment…)
As I noted many times before, SEO is such a fast paced industry. So many news items, so many updates and changes every day.
Following a list with things I learned in the last 30 days about search engine optimization, internet marketing and social media:
Yes. Aaron Wall from infamous SEO Book created a impressive and very comprehensible chart, IMHO. The original PDF version can be downloaded here.

Yes. At least Top SEO’s must now take bounce rate into account when designing and refining a site, SEO Blackhat writes.
Surprisingly, yes. Dutch Search Marketer Eduard Blacquière received the answer through the LinkedIn group LinkedSEO. It said: “NoIndex is a request to not show the page in the results. PR still passes. NoFollow, PR doesn’t pass but does accumulate”.
Well, I don’t know if we’re ever going to make it to the homepage of Google. But the “Big G” linked to its new phone with T-Mobile at the end of October. According to Search Engine Roundtable, more than 800,000 unique visitors went to that page during the week the link was active. In one day, more than 233,000 unique visitors were registered. One can only dream…
Maybe. Marios Alexandrou from All Things SE explains BrowseRank, a measure developed by Microsoft with the purpose of outperforming Google’s PageRank, in a very interesting post.
Saad Kamal reveals the secret in a very useful post. First, in order to find authority links: spy on your competitors Find out which .edu/.gov/.mil are linking to your competitor, with a command like “linkdomain:www.google.com site:edu”. Then get Links from .Edu/.Gov/.Mil blogs on your Niche, with a command like the following: “Keyword+inurl:blog site:.edu”. Saad offers many more great tips.
Yes. Laura Callow delivers great insights on that, backed up by research and data. Among others, she writes that online comments and reviews posted by the enthusiasts are second only to word of mouth as a purchase driver for all web users.
Paul Teitelmann from Search Engine People provides a fantastic list. It includes directories like World Site Index, Dmoz Zilla and Octopedia.
Andrew Heaps from Latitude has some valuable tips. Among others: Phase the transition. And don’t forget to tell the search engines.
Lee Odden from the Online Marketing Blog wrote a great post with over 20 Must Read books about social media marketing. It includes “Cluetrain Manifesto“, “Groundswell”, Seth Godin’s “Tribes”, James Surowieki’s “The Wisdom Of Crowds” and Paul Gillin’s “Secrets of Social Media Marketing”.
I am aware that this list could be ten times longer. Did I miss any of the “big stories” in SEO, in your opinion? Let me know!
Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
“There’s no two ways about it – SEO is hot again”, writes Rand Fishkin, CEO of the Seattle based SEO company SEOmoz, in his latest blog post. He observes that not only his firm has received a higher than normal volume of requests for consulting, but also various job sections for SEO professionals are thriving.
The employment trend chart by job search engine Simply Hired shows a 147% increase in SEO jobs in the last one and a half years alone:
Fishkin lists 8 reasons why Search Engine Optimization is becoming more attractive to companies in a down market:
While I never would dare to compare my one man consultancy with a well-known SEO agency like SEOmoz, I personally can confirm that there is an increased interest in SEO. Although, as Search Engine Watch summarized recently in a great post, “the SEO process still requires an introduction at the onset of any presentation.”
Indeed, the majority of companies still seems to have a lack of knowledge when it comes to SEO. They either want you to be the miracle worker (”Can you help me to rank no. 1 in Google for keyword XY in one week?”), or prefer a paid search campaign only. As Rand explains perfectly in his post, SEO being discovered because company delivers more bang for the buck in times of marketing budget cuts.
Additionally, Forrester’s Kim Le Quoc and Jaap Favier stated in their report titled“How to Stimulate Consumer to Buy Online”:
“Creating preference with online buyers starts with search engine optimization (SEO). As search increases in complexity, marketing leaders need to move their teams toward advanced search marketing programs.”
These are my personal 4 tips when talking to a potential client:
Do you have other suggestions?
Posted by (0) Comment
Let us remember that, as much has been given us, much will be expected from us, and that true homage comes from the heart as well as from the lips, and shows itself in deeds. (Theodore Rosevelt)
Happy Thanksgiving, everybody! I wish you a relaxing day, a wonderful gathering with family and friends – and a delicious culinary feast.
In honor of this day, many search engines and websites in the search industry got ‘dressed up’. Here is a little collection of Thanksgiving logos:
Ask.com:

Live.com:

Google:

Yahoo:

Dogpile:

AOL.com:

Friendfeed:

Cre8asite Forums:

Search Engine Roundtable:

Plus: Check out Search Insider’s great post “10 Reasons Search Marketers Should Be Greatful”. It’s a must-read!
A new whitepaper by search marketing firm iProspect shows that 62% of search users click on links found on the first page of search results.
Overall, 90% of search users will click on links found in the first three pages of search results. The findings show the increased importance of first page placement, along with the value of being found in the Top 20 and Top 30.
Other findings:
Pretty impressive results. This definitely show how important it is to rank in the first 20 SERPs of the major search engines.
Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
I have to admit. I am not the biggest fan of optimizing Flash websites. There are tons of blog posts which have written extensively how to SEO Flash. We all know the reasons: The search engines don’t know how to crawl these kind of sites, they eat up too much bandwidth, they have a slow load time, they’re CPU heavy etc.
From today there will be less headaches for SEOs and more love for Flash – supposedly. Google and Yahoo announced that they will be able to crawl Flash websites – thanks to Adobe. Apparently the software company has created a special Flash player which will aid the search engine in crawling the web content.
The Google webmaster blog has a great Q&A regarding the improvements. A quick summary:
Mmmm. Interesting. How was the reaction of the blogosphere? Huge. According to Trendpedia there were around 7000 posts published about this topic within the last 24 hours. The chart looks quite impressive:

There have been quite a lot of doubts and critical voices out there about this news.
Mathew Ingram writes in his great blog post titled “News Flash: Flash Websites Still Suck”:
I also have to wonder whether the ability to search through Flash files is going to be that great for websites, since the main thing that gets you higher in Google search results is the number (and quality) of links that you have to your content. (…) But the biggest fly in the ointment for me is the simple fact that most Flash websites are — not to put too fine a point on it — crap.
Techcrunch weighs in:
Becoming visible is one thing, actually ranking highly is another. Google currently can find about 73 million Flash files on the Web. But until Adobe makes it easy for the average Webmaster or blogger to link deeply into those Flash files, they are not likely to appear at the top of many search results.
Andy Beal from Marketing Pilgrim adds:
Google just destroyed the web. (…) Until (the search engine) can demonstrate that its Flash crawling capabilities are equal to its HTML crawling, you risk building a site that, while indexable, is not as “optimized” as its simple HTML cousin.
And Lisa Barone from the Bruce Clay Blog doesn’t spare with criticism:
Flash Web sites are evil. (…) They’re a lame attempt to make your boring site look interesting by distracting users with pretty pictures and moving frames. (…) My SEO advice: Stick with creating HTML-based Web sites that users will want to interact with.
What does this mean for Search Engine Optimization Professsionals?
Search Engine Land has a great summary:
Can SEOs now remove the “review Flash implementation” line from their checklists? Probably not. However, it should be easier for SEOs to work with Flash-based sites going forward. SEOs should keep in mind that these new algorithms don’t take into account any meta data or formatting markup in the Flash file and, for now, Google’s cache won’t show a representation of the extracted text so site owners can’t verify what is actually being crawled by viewing the cached copy.
Plus:
If you really HAVE to use Flash – read Jonathan Hochman’s useful article ‘How to SEO Flash’ and SEO Book’s great post ‘How to Flash sites rank well‘, among others. And get the 117 design guidelines for Flash usability by usability guru Jakob Nielson. It costs $60 – but it’s worth it.
I have to admit. I am not the biggest fan of optimizing Flash websites. There are tons of blog posts which have written extensively how to SEO Flash. We all know the reasons: The search engines don’t know how to crawl these kind of sites, they eat up too much bandwidth, they have a slow load time, they’re CPU heavy etc.
From today there will be less headaches for SEOs and more love for Flash – supposedly. Google and Yahoo announced that they will be able to crawl Flash websites – thanks to Adobe. Apparently the software company has created a special Flash player which will aid the search engine in crawling the web content.
The Google webmaster blog has a great Q&A regarding the improvements. A quick summary:
Mmmm. Interesting. How was the reaction of the blogosphere? Huge. According to Trendpedia there were around 7000 posts published about this topic within the last 24 hours. The chart looks quite impressive:

There have been quite a lot of doubts and critical voices out there in the blogosphere about this news.
Mathew Ingram writes in his great blog post titled “News Flash: Flash Websites Still Suck”:
I also have to wonder whether the ability to search through Flash files is going to be that great for websites, since the main thing that gets you higher in Google search results is the number (and quality) of links that you have to your content. (…) But the biggest fly in the ointment for me is the simple fact that most Flash websites are — not to put too fine a point on it — crap.
Techcrunch weighs in:
Becoming visible is one thing, actually ranking highly is another. Google currently can find about 73 million Flash files on the Web. But until Adobe makes it easy for the average Webmaster or blogger to link deeply into those Flash files, they are not likely to appear at the top of many search results.
Andy Beal from Marketing Pilgrim adds:
Google just destroyed the web. (…) Until (the search engine) can demonstrate that its Flash crawling capabilities are equal to its HTML crawling, you risk building a site that, while indexable, is not as “optimized” as its simple HTML cousin.
And Lisa Barone from the Bruce Clay Blog doesn’t spare with criticism:
Flash Web sites are evil. (…) They’re a lame attempt to make your boring site look interesting by distracting users with pretty pictures and moving frames. (…) My SEO advice: Stick with creating HTML-based Web sites that users will want to interact with.
What does this mean for Search Engine Optimization Professsionals?
Search Engine Land has a great summary:
Can SEOs now remove the “review Flash implementation” line from their checklists? Probably not. However, it should be easier for SEOs to work with Flash-based sites going forward. SEOs should keep in mind that these new algorithms don’t take into account any meta data or formatting markup in the Flash file and, for now, Google’s cache won’t show a representation of the extracted text so site owners can’t verify what is actually being crawled by viewing the cached copy.
Plus:
If you really HAVE to use Flash – read Jonathan Hochman’s useful article ‘How to SEO Flash’ and SEO Book’s great post ‘How to Flash sites rank well‘, among others. And get the 117 design guidelines for Flash usability by usability guru Jakob Nielson. It costs $60 – but it’s worth it.